DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20222153
Published: 2022-08-24

Challenges of incorporating e-learning in medical education-a review

Anitha P., Narayana Krishnappa, Ruchi Dhar

Abstract


In this modern era of electronic gadgets learning is made easy and more effective using the electronic media. E-learning is it really a boon or a burden for medical education and the educators? E-learning is defined as learning mediated by technology, such as the world wide web, internet, and multi-media, based computer applications. All peer reviewed journals articles from 2009 to 2022 that reported the challenges of implementation of the e- learning were included in the study. The search was completed by three researchers over a period of 1 month from databases like Scopus, Medline, biomedical central and Google scholar. Term used for online search was “e-learning” in medical education. The common challenges in e-learning are lack of skills, inadequate time, poor infrastructure, poor communication and negative attitude of the educators. These challenges can be overcome by developing necessary skills, adopting new tools, and by better communication and having a positive attitude. E-learning in medicine is a relatively new concept. Hence it becomes imperative that the national medical council at the policy making and enforcing level become more vigilant on the fact that whether the respective Institutions are effectively using the e-learning platform for the benefit of the students or not. Whether the institutions are effectively providing all the technologies, teacher training, teaching aids for the medical teachers or not. Finally, whether the medical teachers are receptive of the new changes and willing to make better use of e-learning for the benefit of students.


Keywords


E-learning, Medical education, Challenges, National medical council

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207-12.

MCI Vision 2015 Booklet. Medical Council of India. Available at: www.mciindia.org/tools/announcement/ MCI_booklet.pdf. Accessed on June 18, 2016.

Choules AP. The use of e-learning in medical education: A review of the current situation. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:212-6.

Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: E-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30:455-73.

Al-Shorbaji N, Atun R, Car J, Majeed A, Wheeler E (eds). E-learning for undergraduate health professional education-a systematic review informing a radical transformation of health workforce development. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2015. Available at: http://whoeducationguidelines.org/content/e-learning-report. Accessed on June 18, 2016.

George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z et al. Online e-learning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4:10406.

Veeramani R, Madhugiri VS, Chand P. Perception of MBBS students to “flipped class room” approach in neuroanatomy module. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48:138-43.

MazloomyMahmoodabad SS, Barkhordari A, Nadrian H, Moshiri O, Yavari MT. Survey of ownership and use of mobile phones among medical science students in Yazd. Pak J Biol Sci. 2009;12:1430-3.

Soni A. Choosing The Right eLearning Methods: Factors and Elements. Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/choosing-right-elearning-methods-factors-elements. Accessed on March 15, 2020.

Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10-28.

Lynagh M, Burton R, Sanson-Fisher R. A systematic review of medical skills laboratory training: where to from here? Med Educ. 2007;41:879-87.

Lund F, Schultz J-H, Maatouk I, Krautter M, Möltner A, Werner A, et al. Effectiveness of IV cannulation skills laboratory training and its transfer into clinical practice: A randomized, controlled trial. PloS One. 2012;7:e32831.

Niebuhr V, Niebuhr B, Trumble J, Urbani M. Online faculty development for creating E-learning materials. Edu Health. 2014;27(3):255-61.

Dyrbye L, Cumyn A, Day H, Heflin M. A qualitative study of physicians’ experiences with online learning in a master's degree program: benefits, challenges, and proposed solutions. Med Teach. 2009;31(2):e40-6.

Wilson F. Teaching by residents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;0:1-4.

Brueckner J, Gould D. Health Science Faculty Members' Perceptions of Curricular Integration: Insights and Obstacles. Int Asso Med Sci Educators. 2006. Available at: http://www.iamse.org/mse-article/health-science-faculty-members-perceptions-of-curricular-integration-insights-and-obstacles. Accessed on March 15, 2020.

Perlman R, Christner J, Ross P, Lypson M. A successful faculty development program for implementing a sociocultural ePortfolio assessment tool. Aca Med. 2014;89(2):257-62.

Bediang G, Stoll B, Geissbuhler A, Klohn A, Stuckelberger A, Nko'o S et al. Computer literacy and e-learning perception in Cameroon: the case of Yaounde Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. BMC Med Edu. 2013;13(57):1-8.

Attardi S, Rogers K. Design and implementation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory. AnatSci Educ. 2015;8:53-62.

Bury J, Martin L, Roberts S. Achieving change through mutual development: supported online learning and the evolving roles of health and information professionals. Health Inf Libr J. 2006;23(1):22-31.

Skye E, Wimsatt L, Master-Hunter T. Developing online learning modules in a family medicine residency. Fam Med. 2011;43(3):185-92.

Maloney S, Haas R, Keating J, Molloy E, Jolly B, Sims J. Breakeven, cost benefit, cost effectiveness, and willingness to pay for web-based versus face-to-face education delivery for health professionals. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2):e47.