DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20211640

Questionnaire feedback from MBBS second year students about current examination trends and their opinion for perspective changes

Fazeel Zubair Ahmed, Ravi Hanumanthappa Kudthni

Abstract


Background: All subjects of MBBS do not have same examination pattern especially concerning to question paper pattern and distribution of marks. As a result, students are experiencing variety of examination patterns during their study. Neither is their uniformity of examination pattern throughout the country nor there is uniformity within a university. In such situation, it would be wise to take feedback from students which could help in redesigning the examination pattern. This study was done to collect students’ opinion regarding current examination methods and possible changes that might be required in existing assessment methods.

Methods: Questionnaire based study was done on MBBS second year students of Viswabharathi medical college. Questionnaire consisted of 10 questions about examinations faced by the students. Each question had five options arranged according to 5-point Likert scale.

Results: 99 students participated in this study. 51.52% students preferred having two essay questions and 42.42% preferred having one essay question in final theory exam. 52.53% preferred to have 40 marks as weightage of one paper. 50.51% supported having illustration-based questions in their final theory examinations. 79.80% stated that at least 30 days of preparation holidays are required for them before their final exams. 48.48% preferred having five very short answer questions. 48.48% stated that weekend tests conducted by their institute were helpful to them. 66.66% disagreed upon increasing number of questions in final examination. 63.63% agreed on having MCQ’s. 48.48% agreed on having viva voce during every internal examination. Consensus could not be reached upon frequency of institutional tests.

Conclusions: This study highlighted certain shortcomings in medical education with respect to examinations. Weightage and number of questions might be increased marginally to have a uniform pattern. Question paper should have more very short answer questions and less essay questions. Illustration based questions should also be introduced. 30 days of preparation holidays must be given before final exams for self-study.


Keywords


Feedback, Examination, Medical students, Questionnaire, Opinion, India

Full Text:

PDF

References


All India Institute of Medical Sciences. Syllabus MBBS at the AIIMS. New Delhi. 2005.

NTR university of health sciences. Hand Book for Students MBBS course regulations. Vijayawada.

Rajiv Gandhi university of health sciences. Revised Ordinance Governing MBBS degree course and curriculum. Bangalore; 2009. Available from: https://www.rguhs.ac.in/courses_rguhs/medical_ordinances/MBBS%20DEGREE%20COURSE%20-%20I%20-%20II-%202004.pdf. Accessed on 24 August 2020.

Sai NP. Comprehensive analysis of theory exam question papers of 2nd MBBS Pharmacology subject in Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2019;8(8):1793.

Preston R, Gratani M, Owens K, Roche P, Zimanyi M, Malau-Aduli B. Exploring the Impact of Assessment on Medical Students’ Learning. Assess Eval High Educ. 2020;45(1):109-24.

Jamshidian S, Haghani F, Yamani N, Sabri MR. Provision of feedback to medical teachers on their educational performance: perspectives of internal medicine teachers. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:85-94.

Herrero JI, Lucena F, Quiroga J. Randomized study showing the benefit of medical study writing multiple choice questions on their learning. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):42.

Preedy VR, Watson RR. 5-Point Likert Scale. In: Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York. 2010;4288-8.

Sharma SC, Maharjan S. Entry knowledge and situational feedback of MBBS students. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2005;3(4):442-8.

Gharibyan H. Assessing students’ knowledge: oral exams vs. written tests. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 2005;37(3):143.