DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20202188

Visual analogue scale: a simple tool in rural region for physician’s global evaluation and patient’s self-evaluation in allergic rhinitis

Ganesh S. Pentewar, Ranjit J. Wagh, Aparna S. Chincholkar

Abstract


Background: The study was done with the objective to study whether the physician’s global evaluation of the consultation corelates with patient’s self-evaluation to patient outcome concerning symptom relief of nasal congestion by using visual analogue scale.

Methods: A total of 52 patients completed a visual analogue score questionnaire presented at the consultation. 52 patients were reached in a seven days follow-up after the consultation. Patient’s outcome measures conducted at MIMER Medical College and Dr. Bhausaheb Sardesai Hospital in rural Maval Taluka in Pune district of Maharashtra state.

Results: Physician’s self-evaluation of the consultation was much more strongly associated with outcome than the patient’s evaluation.

Conclusions: The difference between the physician’s and patient’s evaluation of the consultation to predict patient outcomes indicates that the physician’s self-evaluation of the consultation is of importance.


Keywords


Allergic rhinitis, Physician’s global evaluation, Patient’s self-evaluation, Visual analogue scale

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI, Moore JB, Cox L, Khan DA, et al. The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: An updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunology. 2008;122:1-84.

Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med. 1969;62:989-93.

Arborelius E, Timpka T, Nyce JM. Patients’ comment on video recorded consultations: the “good” GP and the “bad”. Scand J Soc Med. 1992;20:213-6.

Anden A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE. Satisfaction is not all: Patients’ perceptions of outcome of general practice consultations, a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:43.

Anden A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE. Concepts underlying outcome measures in studies of consultations in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24:218-23.

Ahlen GC, Gunnarsson RK. The physician’s self-evaluation of the consultation and patient outcome: A longitudinal study. Scandinavian J Primary Health Care. 2013;31:26-30.

Demoly P, Bousquet PJ, Mesbah K, Bosquet J, Devillier P. Visual analogue scale in patients treated for allergic rhinitis: an observational prospective study in primary care: asthma and rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(8):881-8.

Juniper EF, Stahl E, Doty RL, Simons FE, Allen DB, Howarth PH. Clinical outcomes and adverse effect monitoring in allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(3):390-413.

Horak F, Zieglmayer PU, Zieglmayer R, Kavina A, Leme P. Levocetirizine has a longer duration of action on improving total nasal symptoms score than fexofenadine after single administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60(1):24-31.

Stubner P, Zieglmayer R, Horak F. A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC). Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(6):891-902.

Kalmarzi RN, Khazaei Z, Shahsavar J, Gharibi F, Tavakol M, Khazaei S, et al. The impact of allergic rhinitis on quality of life: a study in western Iran. Biomed Res Ther. 2017;4(9):1629-37.