Risk of hypertension with bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Mandar K. Shah NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Mihika A. Shah NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Sharan D. Shah AMC Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20194287

Keywords:

Bevacizumab, Anti-cancer, Placebo, Hypertension

Abstract

Bevacizumab, a humanized antibody against VEGF, is effective in the treatment of patients with many cancers. However, as with many therapeutic agents, significant side effects are associated with bevacizumab, Hypertension is one of the predominant toxicity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials of bevacizumab to quantify the risk of hypertension. 15 studies following PRISMA guidelines and matching inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected in which a group of patients were either treated with Bevacizumab and a concurrent chemotherapy and another group treated with Placebo and the same chemotherapy. Relative risk (RR) was calculated. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the analysis. A total of 13,070 patients were included. Bevacizumab was associated with a significant increased risk of overall hypertension (RR=3.509; 95% C.I:2.451 to 5.023). 11 trials are included for determining the risk of Grade 3 hypertension including 8799 patients with a significant increased risk (RR=3.909; 95%C.I:1.983 to 7.707). 7 trials are included for determining the risk of hypertension at low dose (2.5 mg/kg/cycle) including 3691 patients associated with a significant increased (RR=2.640; 95%C.I: 1.408 to 4.950). 10 trials are included for determining the risk of hypertension at high dose (5 mg/kg/cycle) including 9379 patients associated with a significant (RR=4.036; 95%C.I: 2.948 to 5.525). Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that bevacizumab may be associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension in patient with a variety of metastatic solid tumors irrespective of dosing.

References

Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocrine Rev. 2004;4(25):581-611.

Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Eng J Med. 2008;19(358):2039-49.

Xiaolei Z, Wu S, Dahut WL, Parikh CR. Risks of proteinuria and hypertension with bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;2(49):186-93.

Karrison T, Kindler HL, Gandara DR, Lu C, Guterz TL, Nichols K, et al. Final analysis of a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) plus bevacizumab (B) or placebo (P) in patients (pts) with malignant mesothelioma (MM). ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2007;25:7526.

Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG. PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419.

Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park SR, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(30):3968-76.

Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, Ravaud A, Bracarda S, Szczylik C, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. The Lancet. 2007;370(9605):2103-11.

Aghajanian C, Blank SV, Goff BA, Judson PL, Teneriello MG, Husain A, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(17):2039.

Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Liu X, Zhu Y, Lu S, et al. BEYOND. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III study of first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or placebo in Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(19):2197-204.

Miles DW, Chan A, Dirix LY, Cortés J, Pivot X, Tomczak P, et al. Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3239-47.

Van Cutsem E, Vervenne WL, Bennouna J, Humblet Y, Gill S, Van Laethem JL, et al. Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(13):2231-7.

Kabbinavar FF, Schulz J, McCleod M, Patel T, Hamm JT, Hecht JR, et al. Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16):3697-705.

Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med. 2004;350(23):2335-42.

Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L, Hainsworth JD, Heim W, Berlin J, Holmgren E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3502-8.

Hurwitz HI, Tebbutt NC, Kabbinavar F, Giantonio BJ, Guan ZZ, Mitchell L, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials. The Oncol. 2013;18(9):1004-12.

Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Sutherland S, Schrag D, Hurwitz H, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(22):3617.

Kindler HL, Karrison TG, Gandara DR, Lu C, Krug LM, Stevenson JP, et al. Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with malignant mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(20):2509.

Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, Ramlau R, Gorbounova V, Hirsh V, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAiL. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1227-34.

Robert NJ, Diéras V, Glaspy J, Brufsky AM, Bondarenko I, Lipatov ON, et al. RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1252-60.

Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Monk BJ, Huang H, et al. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Eng J Med. 2011;365(26):2473-83.

Gordon MS, Cunningham D. Managing patients treated with bevacizumab combination therapy. Oncology. 2005;69(Suppl. 3):25-33.

Pande AU, Lombardo JC, Fakih M, Wong MK, Iyer RV, Kuvshinoff BW, Javle MM. Bevacizumab (BV) induced hypertension (HT): A manageable toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18_suppl):13539.

Ranpura V, Hapani S, Wu S. Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(5):487-94.

Scappaticci FA, Skillings JR, Holden SN, Gerber HP, Miller K, Kabbinavar F, et al. Arterial thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. J National Cancer Institute. 2007;99(16):1232-9.

Ranpura V, Pulipati B, Chu D, Zhu X, Wu S. Increased risk of high-grade hypertension with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertension. 2010;23(5):460-8.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-25

How to Cite

Shah, M. K., Shah, M. A., & Shah, S. D. (2019). Risk of hypertension with bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 8(10), 2354–2360. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20194287

Issue

Section

Review Articles