DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20190153

Impact of lecture delivery by using PowerPoint presentation and black board and chalk in second year MBBS students in Pharmacology

Preetha Jose, Firoz Thaha, Kavitha Varghese, Aruvi Poomali

Abstract


Background: The use of electronic media and audio-visual aids for teaching has become increasingly common in medical colleges. This teaching method is considered superior to blackboard and chalk by majority of the students and teachers. But the quality of medical education has not drastically improved in comparison. This study compares the impact of lecture delivery using PowerPoint presentation as opposed to blackboard and chalk in medical students attending pharmacology classes.

Methods: This was a cross sectional study done in the second year MBBS students attending pharmacology classes in the Department of Pharmacology at Government Medical College, Thrissur in the year 2017. Students were given lectures on two similar topics, one using PowerPoint presentation and the other using blackboard and chalk by the same teacher. The students were given a post-test after each lecture and marks were analysed using Independent student’s t test. A feedback was also taken from the students regarding the two lecture delivery methods and the data is expressed in percentages.

Results: This study was done in 149 medical students who attended pharmacology classes. The students scored significantly higher marks in the post-test when the lecture was taken using black board and chalk (p <0.001). 58% of the students preferred lecture delivery using PowerPoint compared to 38% preferring black board and chalk. 4% of the students considered both methods equally good.

Conclusions: Lecture delivery using black board and chalk was found to be more efficacious than power point presentation when the marks of the post-tests were compared. However, majority of the students preferred lecture delivery using power point to blackboard and chalk.


Keywords


Blackboard and chalk, Lecture, Pharmacology, PowerPoint

Full Text:

PDF

References


Medical Council of India, Competency based Undergraduate curriculum for the Indian Medical Graduate. 2018;1:136-59.

Garg A, Rataboli PV, Muchandi K. Students' opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004 May 1;36(3):155-8

Mayer RE, Anderson RB. The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. J Edu Psychol. 1992;84(4):444-52.

Bartsch RA, Cobern KM. Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers Education. 2003 Aug 1;41(1):77-86.

Kosslyn SM, Kievit RA, Russell AG, Shephard JM. PowerPoint® presentation flaws and failures: a psychological analysis. Fron Psychol. 2012 Jul 17;3:230.

Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Kumar V. Impact of various lecture delivery methods in pharmacology. EXCLI J. 2010;9:96-101.

Bamne SN, Bamne AS. Comparative study of chalkboard teaching over PowerPoint teaching as a teaching tool in undergraduate medical teaching. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5(12):2585-7.

DeSa SB, Keny MS. PowerPoint versus chalkboard based lectures in pharmacology: evaluation of their impact on medical student’s knowledge and their preferences. Int J Adv Health Sci. 2014;1(5):10-4.

Novelli EL, Fernandes AA. Students' preferred teaching techniques for biochemistry in biomedicine and medicine courses. Biochem Molecular Biol Education. 2007 Jul;35(4):263-6.

Petimani MS, Adake P. Blackboard versus PowerPoint presentation: Students opinion in medical education. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2015;1(9):289-92.

Mohan L, Kamath A, Manish M, Eesha B. Students’ attitudes towards the use of audio visual aids during didactic lectures in pharmacology. J Clin Diag Res. 2010;4(6):3363-8.

Kumar A, Singh R, Mohan L, Kumar MK. Students’ views on audio visual aids used during didactic lectures in a medical college. Asian J Med Sci. 2013;4(2):36-40.

Savoy A, Proctor RW, Salvendy G. Information retention from PowerPoint™ and traditional lectures. Computers Education. 2009 May 1;52(4):858-67.